Skip to main content



                                                                                                            By;   Rabiya Maqsood

A sodomy law is a law that defines certain sexual acts as crimes. The precise sexual acts meant by the term sodomy are rarely spelled out in the law, but are typically understood by courts to include any sexual act deemed to be unnatural or immoral. Sodomy typically includes , oral sex, and bestiality In practice, sodomy laws have rarely been enforced

against heterosexual couples, and have mostly been used to target homosexuals.

As of July 2020, 68 countries as well as five sub-national jurisdictions have laws criminalizing homosexuality.  In 2006 that number was 92

Among these 68 countries, 43 of them criminalize not only male homosexuality but also female homosexuality. In 11 of them, homosexuality is punished with the death penalty. 

Countries (in red) with sodomy laws 



How the Laws Were Used Traditionally

The decision in Lawrence v. Texas is one of a mere handful of cases since the American revolution involving two adults - straight or gay - actually prosecuted for being intimate in private. For most of the 19th and 20th centuries, sodomy laws were used as secondary charges in cases of sexual assault, sex with children, public sex and sex with animals. Most of those cases involved heterosexual sex.

Originally, sodomy laws were part of a larger body of law - derived from church law - designed to prevent no procreative sexuality anywhere, and any sexuality outside of marriage.

Sodomy Laws Are Aimed at Gay People in the 70's

Sodomy laws began to be used in a new way, distinctly against gay people, in the late 1960's. As the young gay rights movement began to make headway, and the social condemnation of being gay began to weaken, social conservatives began to invoke sodomy laws as a justification for discrimination.

In nine states, sodomy laws were explicitly rewritten so that they only applied to gay people. Kansas was the first state to do that in 1969. Kansas was followed in the 1970's by Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Tennessee, and Texas. In two states, Maryland and Oklahoma, courts decided that sodomy laws could not be applied to private heterosexual conduct, leaving what amounted to same-sex only laws in effect.

How the Laws Were Used Against Gay People

These laws were used against gay people in three ways. First, they were used to limit the ability of gay people to raise children. They were used to justify denying gay parents custody of their own children (Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Virginia). They've also been used to justify refusing to let gay people adopt (Florida, Mississippi) and refusing to let gay people become foster parents (Arkansas, Missouri).

Second, the laws have been used to justify firing gay people, or denying gay people jobs. The idea was explained by the F.B.I. in a case which it won in the late 1980's. In 1986, in Bowers v. Hardwick, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the U.S. constitution allowed Georgia to make sodomy a crime. 

After the U.S. Supreme Court said in 1996 (in Romer v. Evans, which struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment that forbade gay rights laws) that states could not discriminate against gay people on the basis of "disapproval," the argument was harder to make. But that didn't stop Georgia's Attorney General from (successfully) using the state's sodomy law as a justification for refusing to hire a lesbian, or the Bowers decision from being offered as a justification for firing a lesbian x-ray technician in a Washington state case last year.

Third, the laws have been used in public debate, to justify denying gay people equal treatment and to discredit LGBT voices. In Utah, the sodomy law was used to justify not protecting gay people from hate crimes. In Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi and Texas they've been used to justify various proposals to ban adoption or foster care, sometimes successfully. Sodomy laws are regularly invoked in civil rights debates: from a reason not to recognize domestic partnerships in Kalamazoo, Michigan (the argument was rejected), to a reason to give "sodomy states" the right to "opt out" of a federal law banning employment discrimination (which hasn't even come to a floor vote in Congress since the mid 90's).

Near Austin, Texas, Williamson County denied Apple Computer a promised tax incentive to build a new plant because the company recognizes domestic partners, said to be a violation of Texas' sodomy law (the county later changed its mind, under heavy pressure from then Governor Ann Richards). Shawnee County Kansas canceled a contract with a company to collect property taxes because the company recognized domestic partners. The county Treasurer said that was a violation of Kansas's sodomy law.

The tax cases may seem almost comic. Losing a job, or worse, losing your family isn't.

The Impact of the Lawrence Decision

All this should change with the Lawrence decision. Lawrence only directly invalidates sodomy laws in the four states that have laws that only apply to gay people: Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri and Kansas. But the equal protection clause forbids subtle discrimination just as much as it forbids obvious discrimination. And there isn't much that is subtle about the government saying that a sodomy law justifies taking your children away because you are gay. Either the law in fact applies to everybody-in which case, it provides no justification for treating gay people differently at all-or it applies just to gay people-in which case, it cannot survive today's ruling


Post a Comment

Please don't comment Links, Addresses and Spam Comments.

Popular posts from this blog

China wants to see Pakistan lead Muslim countries

  China wants to see Pakistan lead Muslim countries China says Pakistan is the only Muslim country with a nuclear power that wants to lead the Muslim world, diplomatic sources said. China wants Pakistan to lead the Muslim world. According to the details, China raises its voice in support of Pakistan at every opportunity. Once again, China has raised its voice in support of Pakistan. Diplomatic sources say that China wants Pakistan, the only nuclear power among Muslim countries, to lead Muslim countries. It is currently circulating in the media that China is going to form a new bloc in the region and China's inclination towards Iran is also a link in the same chain. Beijing is close to finalizing a 25-year strategic partnership agreement with Tehran over a 400 billion investment. China has an important opportunity to increase its importance in Muslim countries in order to increase its influence in the region. Pakistan did not even attend the Kuala Lumpur summit under pressure

President Trump's re-offer of mediation to India and China

  President Trump's re-offer of mediation to India and China The first contact between the two countries' defence ministers in Moscow was that Russia could be a key player in a ceasefire because of the close ties between the two countries. Beijing has turned down an offer of US mediation, while India has also shown no interest. India and China are moving more aggressively than expected. US President talks to journalists. US President Donald Trump says US would be happy to help resolve dispute between India and China on the western Himalayan border. Speaking to reporters in Washington, President Trump said the situation between the two countries on the disputed border is extremely tense. He said that India and China were moving more aggressively than expected. Meanwhile, the British Broadcasting Corporation quoted senior diplomatic sources as saying that Washington was not in a position to mediate due to tensions in Sino-US relations. However, Russia has friendly relations w

Teacher should be like this: During exams, the student was busy in her paper and the teacher take care of her child.

  Teacher should be like this: During exams, the student was busy in her paper and the teacher take care of her child. A picture has been going viral in recent days, in which a teacher is holding a child in his arms in the examination hall while all the students present there are seen solving their papers. This picture is not an ordinary picture, people are calling it the best picture of the year 2020 of Afghanistan. This picture is actually of Kabul University. In one of the halls, the students are busy solving the exam papers. It so happened that a student had brought her four-month-old son with her but he was crying a lot, which made it difficult for the student to solve the exam paper. Instead of solving the exam paper, the student was trying to silence her child. When the teacher in the examination hall saw this scene, he came forward and picked up the child. At the same time, he grabbed the child's feeder, so that he could drink it calmly and be quiet, at the same time the