Skip to main content



                                                                                                            By;   Rabiya Maqsood

A sodomy law is a law that defines certain sexual acts as crimes. The precise sexual acts meant by the term sodomy are rarely spelled out in the law, but are typically understood by courts to include any sexual act deemed to be unnatural or immoral. Sodomy typically includes , oral sex, and bestiality In practice, sodomy laws have rarely been enforced

against heterosexual couples, and have mostly been used to target homosexuals.

As of July 2020, 68 countries as well as five sub-national jurisdictions have laws criminalizing homosexuality.  In 2006 that number was 92

Among these 68 countries, 43 of them criminalize not only male homosexuality but also female homosexuality. In 11 of them, homosexuality is punished with the death penalty. 

Countries (in red) with sodomy laws 



How the Laws Were Used Traditionally

The decision in Lawrence v. Texas is one of a mere handful of cases since the American revolution involving two adults - straight or gay - actually prosecuted for being intimate in private. For most of the 19th and 20th centuries, sodomy laws were used as secondary charges in cases of sexual assault, sex with children, public sex and sex with animals. Most of those cases involved heterosexual sex.

Originally, sodomy laws were part of a larger body of law - derived from church law - designed to prevent no procreative sexuality anywhere, and any sexuality outside of marriage.

Sodomy Laws Are Aimed at Gay People in the 70's

Sodomy laws began to be used in a new way, distinctly against gay people, in the late 1960's. As the young gay rights movement began to make headway, and the social condemnation of being gay began to weaken, social conservatives began to invoke sodomy laws as a justification for discrimination.

In nine states, sodomy laws were explicitly rewritten so that they only applied to gay people. Kansas was the first state to do that in 1969. Kansas was followed in the 1970's by Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Tennessee, and Texas. In two states, Maryland and Oklahoma, courts decided that sodomy laws could not be applied to private heterosexual conduct, leaving what amounted to same-sex only laws in effect.

How the Laws Were Used Against Gay People

These laws were used against gay people in three ways. First, they were used to limit the ability of gay people to raise children. They were used to justify denying gay parents custody of their own children (Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Virginia). They've also been used to justify refusing to let gay people adopt (Florida, Mississippi) and refusing to let gay people become foster parents (Arkansas, Missouri).

Second, the laws have been used to justify firing gay people, or denying gay people jobs. The idea was explained by the F.B.I. in a case which it won in the late 1980's. In 1986, in Bowers v. Hardwick, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the U.S. constitution allowed Georgia to make sodomy a crime. 

After the U.S. Supreme Court said in 1996 (in Romer v. Evans, which struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment that forbade gay rights laws) that states could not discriminate against gay people on the basis of "disapproval," the argument was harder to make. But that didn't stop Georgia's Attorney General from (successfully) using the state's sodomy law as a justification for refusing to hire a lesbian, or the Bowers decision from being offered as a justification for firing a lesbian x-ray technician in a Washington state case last year.

Third, the laws have been used in public debate, to justify denying gay people equal treatment and to discredit LGBT voices. In Utah, the sodomy law was used to justify not protecting gay people from hate crimes. In Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi and Texas they've been used to justify various proposals to ban adoption or foster care, sometimes successfully. Sodomy laws are regularly invoked in civil rights debates: from a reason not to recognize domestic partnerships in Kalamazoo, Michigan (the argument was rejected), to a reason to give "sodomy states" the right to "opt out" of a federal law banning employment discrimination (which hasn't even come to a floor vote in Congress since the mid 90's).

Near Austin, Texas, Williamson County denied Apple Computer a promised tax incentive to build a new plant because the company recognizes domestic partners, said to be a violation of Texas' sodomy law (the county later changed its mind, under heavy pressure from then Governor Ann Richards). Shawnee County Kansas canceled a contract with a company to collect property taxes because the company recognized domestic partners. The county Treasurer said that was a violation of Kansas's sodomy law.

The tax cases may seem almost comic. Losing a job, or worse, losing your family isn't.

The Impact of the Lawrence Decision

All this should change with the Lawrence decision. Lawrence only directly invalidates sodomy laws in the four states that have laws that only apply to gay people: Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri and Kansas. But the equal protection clause forbids subtle discrimination just as much as it forbids obvious discrimination. And there isn't much that is subtle about the government saying that a sodomy law justifies taking your children away because you are gay. Either the law in fact applies to everybody-in which case, it provides no justification for treating gay people differently at all-or it applies just to gay people-in which case, it cannot survive today's ruling


Post a Comment

Please don't comment Links, Addresses and Spam Comments.

Popular posts from this blog

China wants to see Pakistan lead Muslim countries

  China wants to see Pakistan lead Muslim countries China says Pakistan is the only Muslim country with a nuclear power that wants to lead the Muslim world, diplomatic sources said. China wants Pakistan to lead the Muslim world. According to the details, China raises its voice in support of Pakistan at every opportunity. Once again, China has raised its voice in support of Pakistan. Diplomatic sources say that China wants Pakistan, the only nuclear power among Muslim countries, to lead Muslim countries. It is currently circulating in the media that China is going to form a new bloc in the region and China's inclination towards Iran is also a link in the same chain. Beijing is close to finalizing a 25-year strategic partnership agreement with Tehran over a 400 billion investment. China has an important opportunity to increase its importance in Muslim countries in order to increase its influence in the region. Pakistan did not even attend the Kuala Lumpur summit under pressure

Pakistan and Saudi Arabia: Kashmir issue or demand for repayment of loans?

 While the Corona epidemic has had a profound effect on the global health system, the virus has also hit the economies of most countries, and now even prosperous countries are worried about their spending. A clear example of this is the oil-dependent Arab countries, especially Saudi Arabia. Relations between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and the economic situation in Saudi Arabia have been hotly debated on social media these days. The talk started with a statement by the Foreign Minister of Pakistan on Kashmir. Pakistan's Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said in a program on private TV channel ARY, "I am telling this friend today that Pakistan's Muslims and Pakistanis who are ready to die fighting for your integrity and sovereignty Today, they are asking you to play the leadership role that the Muslim Ummah is expecting from you. Shah Mehmood Qureshi said that OIC should not play a policy of blindfold and rescue. He said that a meeting of foreign ministers should be conve

Attack on Saudi Arabia, Pakistan strongly condemns

  Attack on Saudi Arabia, Pakistan strongly condemns Pakistan has strongly condemned missile and drone strikes on Saudi Arabia by Houthi rebels. Pakistan reiterated its full support and solidarity with Saudi Arabia and demanded an immediate end to such attacks. Pakistan appreciated successful deterrence of drone and missile strikes. The Arab League had thwarted another drone and ballistic missile attack by Houthi rebels yesterday. Through dynamite-laden drones attempts were made to target southern Saudi Arabia and the ballistic missile was fired at Jazan. Both attacks were destroyed before reaching the destination. Yesterday, PML-N President Shahbaz Sharif strongly condemned the missile and drone attack on Saudi Arabia, calling it an attack on the entire Ummah. In his statement, Shahbaz Sharif said that the security, geographical integrity and sovereignty of the Holy Hijaz is dearer to every Muslim than his own life. Attacking Saudi Arabia is tantamount to attacking the entire Um